Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 4 de 4
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Sci Rep ; 13(1): 12257, 2023 07 28.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37507539

ABSTRACT

Rhabdomyolysis is a syndrome potentially fatal and has been associated with selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs) treatment in a few case reports. Herein, we purpose to establish the correlation between SSRIs use and rhabdomyolysis using the U.S. Food and Drug Administration Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS) database. We conducted an analysis on reports that were submitted to the FAERS database during the period between January 1, 2004, and December 31, 2022. Four algorithms, including reporting odds ratio (ROR), proportional reporting ratio (PRR), Bayesian confidence propagation neural network (BCPNN), and empirical Bayes geometric mean (EBGM), were employed to quantify the signals of rhabdomyolysis associated with SSRIs. In total, 16,011,277 non-duplicated reports were obtained and analyzed. Among 33,574 reports related to rhabdomyolysis, SSRIs were classified as primary suspected drug in 889 cases. Disproportionality analysis identified a positive signal between rhabdomyolysis and SSRIs (ROR: 2.86, 95% CI 2.67-3.05; PRR: 2.84, χ2: 1037.16; IC0.25 = 1.39; EBGM0.5 = 2.64). Among six SSRIs, fluvoxamine had the strongest signal (ROR: 11.64, 95% CI 8.00-16.93; PRR: 11.38, χ2: 265.51; IC0.25 = 2.41; EBGM0.5 = 8.31), whereas no significant signal of rhabdomyolysis was detected for paroxetine (ROR: 1.83, 95% CI 1.55-2.15; PRR: 1.82, χ2: 53.82; IC0.25 = 0.73; EBGM0.5 = 1.59). After excluding cases co-administered with statins, the signal of rhabdomyolysis associated with SSRIs remains significant. Our analysis reveals that there are differences in safety signals among six SSRIs in respect to the risk of rhabdomyolysis, with fluvoxamine displaying the highest risk signal, while paroxetine did not show a significant signal. Given the potentially lethal nature of rhabdomyolysis, healthcare professionals should inform patients of the potential risk of rhabdomyolysis associated with SSRIs prior to initiating treatment.


Subject(s)
Rhabdomyolysis , Selective Serotonin Reuptake Inhibitors , United States/epidemiology , Humans , Selective Serotonin Reuptake Inhibitors/adverse effects , Bayes Theorem , Pharmacovigilance , Fluvoxamine , Paroxetine , Adverse Drug Reaction Reporting Systems , Rhabdomyolysis/chemically induced , Rhabdomyolysis/epidemiology , United States Food and Drug Administration
2.
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int ; 30(12): 34518-34535, 2023 Mar.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36515871

ABSTRACT

Due to the intensified environmental protection consciousness of enterprises and consumers, the green winner determination (GWD) considering environmental performance becomes very important for the 4PL transportation service procurement. In this paper, a new GWD method is studied, which considers different types of attributes including those related to environmental performance and the consensus reaching process (CRP). To characterize multiple types of attributes, linguistic terms, interval numbers, and crisp numbers are combined. To achieve an acceptable consensus level among linguistic evaluations given by different experts, a minimum adjustment consensus model is constructed. And on this basis, an interactive CRP is proposed. Integrating the heterogeneous information addressing process and the CRP, a HC-VIKOR method is developed to promote the 4PL's operational efficiency and service quality. Further, a numerical example is designed to demonstrate the effectiveness of the proposed method. Sensitivity analysis reveals that both the acceptable consensus threshold and the weight of group utility have a significant influence on the winner determination result. Comparison analysis shows that the proposed method outperforms the existing methods. Our study not only extends the traditional winner determination but also provides decision support for the 4PL to provide transportation services efficiently.


Subject(s)
Conservation of Natural Resources , Transportation , Consensus , Linguistics
3.
IEEE Trans Cybern ; 52(10): 10052-10063, 2022 Oct.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34191738

ABSTRACT

Consistency is an important issue in linguistic decision making with various consistency measures and consistency improving methods available in the literature. However, existing linguistic consistency studies omit the fact that words mean different things for different people, that is, decision makers' personalized individual semantics (PISs) over their expressed linguistic preferences are ignored. Therefore, the aim of this article is to propose a novel consistency improving approach based on PISs in linguistic group decision making. The proposed approach combines the characteristics of personalized representation and integrates the PIS-based model in measuring and improving the consistency of linguistic preference relations. A detailed numerical and comparative analysis to support the feasibility of the proposed approach is provided.


Subject(s)
Decision Making , Fuzzy Logic , Feedback , Humans , Linguistics
4.
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int ; 25(17): 16885-16899, 2018 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29623640

ABSTRACT

The resource allocation of air pollution treatment in China is a complex problem, since many alternatives are available and many criteria influence mutually. A number of stakeholders participate in this issue holding different opinions because of the benefits they value. So a method is needed, based on the analytic network process (ANP) and large-group decision-making (LGDM), to rank the alternatives considering interdependent criteria and stakeholders' opinions. In this method, the criteria related to air pollution treatment are examined by experts. Then, the network structure of the problem is constructed based on the relationships between the criteria. Further, every participant in each group provide comparison matrices by judging the importance between criteria according to dominance, regarding a certain criteria (or goal), and the geometric average comparison matrix of each group is obtained. The decision weight of each group is derived by combining the subjective weight and the objective weight, in which the subjective weight is provided by organizers, while the objective weight is determined by considering the consensus levels of groups. The final comparison matrices are obtained by the geometric average of comparison matrices and the decision weights. Next, the resource allocation is made according to the priorities of the alternatives using the super decision software. Finally, an example is given to illustrate the use of the proposed method.


Subject(s)
Air Pollution/analysis , Conservation of Natural Resources/methods , China , Consensus , Decision Making , Decision Support Techniques , Resource Allocation
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...